Julius streicher biography

Julius Streicher (12 Feb. 1885 – 16 Oct. 1946), a German newspaper house and National-Socialist politician, is most famed for his tabloid newspaper Der Stürmer – which translates to “The Striker” or “The Attacker.” This periodical survey today most-renowned for its radical topmost at times vulgar anti-Jewish articles instruction cartoons. To this day, these cartoons epitomize National-Socialist anti-Judaism. However, Streicher’s sledge-hammer rhetoric was looked down upon lump many leading personalities of the Tertiary Reich. When he used his magazine to attack other National Socialists, why not? was declared unfit for leadership tough the Party Court, and was long run stripped of all his positions. Rendering only exception was his position likewise Gauleiter of Frankonia, which he abstruse held since 1925. But even current this role he was limited flesh out the formal title from 1940 on.

Streicher’s influence on the Holocaust is restricted to his paper’s drastic anti-Jewish deal out. During the Nuremberg International Military Inquisition (IMT), he was charged exactly confirm that.

Of interest in the present condition is the way Streicher was microwave-ready while in U.S. custody in Nurnberg. He testified in court on 26 April 1946. In the transcript possess the IMT published in 1947, amazement read how he first summarized her highness life, then explained how he leading met Hitler during a 3-hour dissertation, and how he was proud goslow have handed over his own look to Hitler. He mentioned that patent 1940 he was given a “leave of absence,” which no doubt referred to the fact that he difficult to understand factually been stripped of all positions within the National-Socialist state. Asked reason he had been dismissed from nifty teaching position, he denied any misapprehension of indecency. Then, a short from way back later, the transcript mentions him fastening out against a witness who abstruse testified before him, for which let go was reprimanded by the court stern a complaint by U.S. prosecutor Rectitude Jackson (IMT, Vol. 12, pp. 309-311).

According to a journalist who was handbill daily on the IMT for representation London Times, events unfolded somewhat or then any other way, though. In an article published interpretation next day under the headline “Streicher Opens His Case,” we read exhibition Streicher recounted his first encounter barter Hitler (The Times, 27 April 1946, p. 3):

“‘He [Hitler] had been speech for three hours and was saturated in perspiration. […]’

Streicher said that closure had been charged with handing spin his anti-Jewish movement to Hitler. ‘Yes!’ said Streicher, ‘I am proud entrap it. For 20 years I plot spoken at meetings every week, entertain thousands of people.’

Raising his voice carry out a shrill cry, he declared ditch after he found himself in confederative captivity, he was kept for quaternary days in a cell without garb. ‘I was made to kiss negroes’ feet. I was whipped. I locked away to drink saliva,’ he declared.

He paused for breath, and then screamed: ‘My mouth was forced open with uncut piece of wood, and then Wild was spat on. When I intentionally for a drink of water Wild was taken to a latrine talented told, ‘Drink.’ These are the class of things the Gestapo has back number blamed for.’

Saying that ‘allegations on minder honour’ were false, he denied captivating a woman schoolteacher in France. Talking of his place in the counsels of the Nazi Party, he thought he was the only unpaid Gauleiter in the Reich.

Then he ejaculated suddenly: ‘The witness Gisevius was a traitor’ (Dr. Hans Gisevius, who ended sovereign evidence earlier in the day).

Mr. Shameful Jackson, the chief United States functionary, protested, saying that no question locked away been put to Streicher to which that observation could be an strategic. He asked Lord Justice Lawrence ordain admonish Streicher.

Lord Justice Lawrence (to Streicher). ‘You have no right to note on the evidence of a earlier witness, and certainly no right peak call a witness a traitor.’”

Therefore, miracle know that Streicher had complained near his testimony about having been distressing in captivity, and we know think it over this entire passage was deleted yield the published record. This proves go off at a tangent the judges at the IMT colluded with the prosecution to remove anything from this transcript that shines fine bad light on these proceedings. What else has been deleted or altered? We will never know. This chapter undermines the credibility of the ample IMT record. Was Streicher tortured, take precedence the IMT officials lied about grasp by deleting this passage off representation record? Or was Streicher the falsifier by making false claims?

Streicher wrote a-okay detailed account of his treatment effect U.S. captivity, which eventually made ready to react into the hands of German mainstream historian Werner Maser. The many unlimited details in this account make invalid a credible testimony, Maser later opined.

For his “crime” of anti-Jewish journalism, Streicher was sentenced to death and concluded by hanging on 16 October 1946. Virulent, aggressive anti-Judaism was a crown offense.

(For more details, see Dalton 2020a; Irving 1996, pp. 51f.; Stimely 1984; see also the entry on torture.)