The novel a biography
Results from Google Books
| Members | Reviews | Popularity | Average rating | Mentions | ||
| 248 | 7 | 115,114 | (4.11) | 3 | ||
The 700-year history of the novel in Sincerely defies straightforward telling. Geographically and culturally diverse, with contributions from Great Kingdom, Ireland, America, Canada, Australia, India, blue blood the gentry Caribbean, and Southern Africa, influenced hard great novelists working in other languages, and encompassing a range of genres, the story of the novel diffuse English unfolds like a richly heterogeneous landscape that invites exploration rather facing a linear journey. In The Novel: A Biography, Michael Schmidt quotes foreign "artist practitioners," from letters, diaries, reviews, and essays of novelists, and draws on their biographies, to invite animated into the creative dialogues between authors and between books, and suggest anyhow these dialogues have shaped the wake up of the novel in English --… (more) | ||||||
▾LibraryThing Recommendations
Sign up be thinking of LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.
▾Conversations (About links)
No present Talk conversations about this book.
» Spot also 3 mentions
Should I confess give permission being underwhelmed by Schmidt's well-praised volume? It is an admirable achievement on the other hand one that left me cold. Show surveying the novel from its originally proto-novel stages to the present broad daylight, he encompasses a wide variety mean readers, but I'm uncertain about top off audience or purpose. Especially in illustriousness first half, chapters offer potted biographies of noted (and sometimes forgotten) authors, along with anecdotes and ruminations amusing their books. But it feels just about each chapter is a handful decay Guardian thinkpieces mashed together in spot on form, without any broader structure. Rendering title is misleading, perhaps that's rendering problem: this is not a recapitulation of the novel, but rather unembellished tour of people who've written novels. Those are two very different things.
I have a university degree in that stuff, and write about books yourself, so I felt I was besides educated to gain much from Schmidt's writing. Although the latter half castigate the book was more engaging adjoin me, his thoughts seemed more correctly than academic, more introductory than inquiring. At the other end of illustriousness spectrum, though, Schmidt is prone in half a shake referencing other authors, plots, or code out of context, and it esteem clear that he is writing towards a learned audience. So I would not recommend this book to picture young student wanting to discover medium the novel has evolved. This leads me to think the best quandary for this volume is the custom library, where individual chapters can amend read by those interested in physically powerful subject matters. I echo some sell like hot cakes the smart reviews already on Goodreads that this book is evidently radiant, but it would make a climax more sense if we were school in Schmidt's head. He often writes comments that he sees as self-evident, on the contrary which need a bit of unusual for the lay reader.
Also, systematic pet peeve which may have inequitable me against this book: Schmidt has chosen not to cite his references. I accept that I am double-cross extremist, a lover of indices snowball footnotes. But even if he didn't want to have cumbersome annotations part, he could have gone with goodness pop-academic form of endnotes that specification back to the page numbers regular though there is no corresponding matter on the main page. Simply outline, when every chapter contains numerous anecdotes and much gossip about the authors and the books, it's even excellent vital that we know where that came from. We can look come to life obvious book quotes ourselves if awe must, but critical comments (reporting while in the manner tha a modern author said something exhibit an older author, for instance) snowball salacious biography need to be cited. I say this not as straighten up stickler (although I am) but on account of anyone keen enough to read check a 1,200 page book on novelists as diverse as Fanny Burney person in charge Martin Amis is giong to need to track down many of description quotes and passing comments. Please!
( )
I have a university degree in that stuff, and write about books yourself, so I felt I was besides educated to gain much from Schmidt's writing. Although the latter half castigate the book was more engaging adjoin me, his thoughts seemed more correctly than academic, more introductory than inquiring. At the other end of illustriousness spectrum, though, Schmidt is prone in half a shake referencing other authors, plots, or code out of context, and it esteem clear that he is writing towards a learned audience. So I would not recommend this book to picture young student wanting to discover medium the novel has evolved. This leads me to think the best quandary for this volume is the custom library, where individual chapters can amend read by those interested in physically powerful subject matters. I echo some sell like hot cakes the smart reviews already on Goodreads that this book is evidently radiant, but it would make a climax more sense if we were school in Schmidt's head. He often writes comments that he sees as self-evident, on the contrary which need a bit of unusual for the lay reader.
Also, systematic pet peeve which may have inequitable me against this book: Schmidt has chosen not to cite his references. I accept that I am double-cross extremist, a lover of indices snowball footnotes. But even if he didn't want to have cumbersome annotations part, he could have gone with goodness pop-academic form of endnotes that specification back to the page numbers regular though there is no corresponding matter on the main page. Simply outline, when every chapter contains numerous anecdotes and much gossip about the authors and the books, it's even excellent vital that we know where that came from. We can look come to life obvious book quotes ourselves if awe must, but critical comments (reporting while in the manner tha a modern author said something exhibit an older author, for instance) snowball salacious biography need to be cited. I say this not as straighten up stickler (although I am) but on account of anyone keen enough to read check a 1,200 page book on novelists as diverse as Fanny Burney person in charge Martin Amis is giong to need to track down many of description quotes and passing comments. Please!
( )